Pigs with Pencils
  • Process
  • August26th

    No Comments

    Chapter Four is proving to be very difficult to write.  Again, multiple false starts with reconsidering all the way through. There are critical things that need to happen in this scene, but because the number of characters in high, each with their own agenda even if we never see just how important from their POV–being that we are limited in POV characters.

    Still, these things must be made to happen. With so many agendas it’s hard to keep the focus. We see it through only one character POV. That character’s perceptions and needs should come first. It’s why I change my mind so much, even considering chopping the whole scene out….it’s a tough one.

  • August21st

    No Comments

    is done.

    Six weeks of rewriting the first three chapters and I believe the first one is done, with maybe two to three sentences that need to be looked at. Its about 2500 words–really short. I chopped about a page out of it in editing today.

    So that’s what I am going to write about–what is it that I chopped out?

    First, realize that this new first chapter is actually half the plot line of my original first chapter–it’s double the length in words to tell half of what happens in chapter one of the submission draft. When I rewrote this chapter, I added two critical things–one, description. A tighter description of place and action. Second, internal dialog, but speaking to motivation–as opposed to a running dialog of thought.

    What did I cut? Internal thought. Motivation. There is one paragraph where my character thinks about something and passes judgment on it. That’s it. I do not describe what she feels or thinks with words from her POV. This is in order to prevent myself from weighing down the prose with explaining–telling. It’s okay to do this with my opening scene, it keeps things active, vital, engaging and lends mystery.

    I ask the readers to infer. I did not say she was, happy, sad, scared, unsure–even if I supposed that she might well think some of those things throughout the scene. Its hard not to, because in some respects, it feels like this kind of telling why someone feels a certain way–is, well, showing. It feels like it adds to the scene–but does it really?

    I chopped it out because it doesn’t advance the action. This scene is about action. The next scene is about action. The scene after that is dramatic conflict. It is slower. There is action, physical action..and mental reaction. Here’s where I might falter a little. I know perfectly well what’s going on and so does my character. I’m just wary. Here’s my bet, and why I’m keeping multiple versions…I’ll chop too much. In rewriting these chapters I changed the entire under structure of this character’s life. In the second and third draft of what I’ve been working on these six weeks, I’ve filled the gaps of hows and whys–and in this fourth draft, I’m chopping back them out, leaving only the bones of the beast, hoping the flavor of the meat still resides in the stew.

  • August18th

    No Comments

    A newly published author with her first book out said it took her no less than twelve years, the majority of that time spent rewriting her singular story. I swoon at the thought. Twelve damnable years!

    At a  snail’s pace I plod along, rewriting, rewriting, rewriting. Last night I’d had enough. I went back to my rough and my submission and then to my current draft and tried to compare, tried to see where the changes were made–do they even  matter?

    It’s hard to even find matching sections on which to make a comparison. The rough is a rough. It’s the telling of a story. The draft is the showing of a story. So I compared drafts. The prose is different, but more than that–what I see now is a weaving of inner and outer reflection. There is description, but not for the sake of describing–that is why I left it out in the first place. No, this is not the same somehow.

    Meanwhile, as I write circles around myself in the mud, the story ever grows. The more concrete and grounded the prose, the deeper and wider the storyline fills in, fleshes out–far into the future, that which I haven’t gotten to yet in the draft. Mere chapters away, but an eternity of time in rewriting land.

    I hate it. It mocks me. I take my little broken spoon, filling up a glass jar with shifting sand. I’ll never be able to capture it. I look back at my footsteps in the desert and have no sense of where I’ve been. Am I coming, am I going, am I lost in circle? So much is a mirage. I worked hard on my submission draft, truly, I did. Only six weeks later I look back and shake my head in despair. Despair. I honestly didn’t understand what they told me in critique.

    I fully understand it now. Rejoice that I understand? No, I feel childish in my lacking ability to perceive things in the broad open light of day. I’ve already written the length of that submission probably more than once, in my subsequent false starts. 10,000 words is next to nothing in my world these days.

    I can’t explain this right, I know. Countless times while learning to draw and paint, instructors have picked up my brush or charcoal and with a few lines or strokes, corrected something right before my eyes that I never even saw. And gratefully I went on.

    So I did in this case too. I took the advice, I worked hard to correct, to re-envision, feeling but not seeing my way through this horrible thing we call story craft. Looking back, my blindness hurts me.

    Beginner’s mind is beautiful, precious thing.  Bold and unafraid, a beginner will push forward happy taking joy in the simple act of doing– a loving protection of sorts. Utter blindness.

    It’s official though. My blushing shame, my cringing feeling at reading where I have been, knowing how well pleased with myself that I was to have even finished—no, I am now a journeyman. I am able to see at least some of my own flaws–and fear the ones I can’t.

    It’s a sign of true growth, but a dangerous time as well. The fragile ego wrestles for control, in hopes of managing the risk to itself. Suddenly, only perfection will do–when the truth is, perfection at this stage is just not possible. You have to be willing to risk. Risk a broken heart to gain greater prize than self preservation has the ability to grant. Let fear win in this stage and you’ll forever be held in the grasp of never having true confidence. It’s the most difficult stage of artistic development, a painful way to live because you’ve grown the wings, earned your birthright to the sky, but are afraid to use them for fear of falling. God, it hurts to fail.

  • August14th

    No Comments

    And I’m at 8,500 words. This is all draft. I started out my rewrite with an alternate VP which my readers didn’t care for. So, what are my thoughts at six weeks….

    Well, I am taking lots of time with it, trying to work with all the things that go into good prose. I am done with plot essentially, so these words are meant to convey milieu, a picture, a concrete place in time with a character the reader gets to know. I’ve stripped out the passive voice. I’ve gone for a lyrical flow to my words. I’ve pulled out my massive thesaurus to delve deep into wordcraft. It’s a different piece. Deeper.

    But my character is different too. She’s changing under these circumstances–and yet, perhaps it’s just the way I perceive her. Was is it to be a child, anyway? And when do we truly change?

    I suppose we shall see. I am considering tossing it back out to my readers, even though I swore I wouldn’t do it until I had it nearly finished–for reading after reading of the first 10,000 words is futile really. Perhaps, better that I say 20,000. If I’m not cooking with gas at 20,000 I should throw in the towel.

  • August1st

    No Comments

    I had a sobering thought today. If I were to have spent all this time on my book and put it into my painting instead–I’d been showing real mastery now. Maybe it’s not fair to think on things in this fashion–after all, I have an MFA and a work history behind me. A year’s worth of solid everyday intensive work would make a huge difference–because that difference would be all about the refinement of existing skill.

    But instead, I’ve taken a different path. I’ve decided to try something new. Ground zero type of new. Self taught ground zero. Well, if you have talent, you can build skill. I’ve always maintained that. I guess I’m just wondering how wise or perhaps unwise I’ve been with my time.

    I wouldn’t wonder about it at all, if I didn’t have this other option. But I do. I could be doing some nice illustration right now, and that has its own great joys about it.

    It’s not wrong to try new things. Sometimes that’s the only way we find new passions in life. But there is a danger in it too–especially if you already know you have talents elsewhere. Who is to say that the quest for my book will only lead me to passable mediocrity–when that same time spent in another venue would lend itself to true mastery? It’s not that I am unwilling to push and try to learn and build my skill at my new venture…I think over my long time at working and reworking, I’ve proven to myself that I certainly have what it takes to at least finish–that’s extremely important to me–to finish.

    But there is no guarantee that even though I’ve tried very hard, I simply won’t have what it takes to achieve something worth all of that time, except in my own personal world. That’s really the truth with any project. But the difference between a professional and a hobbyist is that the professional continues on working very hard at building skill, where the hobbyist is rightfully content with enjoying the work of their hands, skill level being relative and not so much the point.

    Read More | Comments

  • July23rd

    No Comments

    Symbolism. Working on it as I go. Choosing now what I know is already in the draft and making it more specific. The specific naming of things. A bird becomes a wren or raven.  Ground cover becomes sweet clover. That’s where we are at. Description through POV and symbolism.

    The bigger issue will invariably be–when and how to bring in hero#2. Hero #1′s world is coming to life now. If I leave it untouched from the draft, the readers will be heavily invested in Hero #1 and that world–Hero#2 might be like a splash of cold water to the face…I’m just not sure.

  • July19th

    No Comments

    One third Done

    Posted in: Process

    One third through the redraft of my opening scene. At this point in the plot in draft#1 I was at 1,300 words–draft#2 at the same plot point I am at 3,700. And I think it still feels rushed. Rough transitions. Unclear thoughts. Shaky description in places. Tedious. It’s going to come down to paragraph by paragraph editing. Sentence to sentence. Word to word. And even then, who is to say that somehow my original version isn’t better? Different. I could be doing nothing but making things different and that my ability is topped out at this level–no matter the rewriting.

    Awful thoughts, but probably true.

  • July5th

    No Comments

    Last year at this time I was on the annual retreat with sketchbooks and pencils in tow. I had a job pending and I was panicking because it wasn’t a simple job–it was one that required “inspiration.” As a working artist, you learn how to channel those artistic demands and force them to your schedule. But I was having problems. Nothing I drew felt especially good. The concept for the over all piece was shaky and ever changing with only a week to pull it together.

    I remember the night I finished it, carefully setting the book to dry after printing the pages and casing them in. I got up in the middle of the night, unable to sleep, to look at it again and burst into tears. Torn between the fact that it was beautiful and yet I still felt there had to be someone out there it just didn’t please. A terrible moment. Painful.

    So a year later. A book of a wholly different kind. This year it’s notebooks and pens I’m taking, hoping for a bit of inspiration to lead me out of the dark places I seem to wander in. A purposeful wandering, looking for the light–and its not always clear, which way I should go.

    **So I’m back now and as always it was good to get away. Did I come back with something tangible? Not really. Just a few ideas of how to say things, a few notes of things I saw or heard or smelled that might someday help to lend a touch of credibility when I need it. Some photos of things I hope to remember, certainly since these are camera phone pics, and not very good.

    Best of all though, I feel ready to work. Ready to take a fresh whack at it. Hoping to get some momentum out of this small hiatus and looking forward to another one before the summer is over.

    Today at least I don’t mind that I’m not so far into my redraft. It will come along given time and effort and plenty of breaks in between to recharge–really recharge. I’m seeing that just not writing that day is not enough of a break. Needs to be a change of scenery, physical and mental to work it’s soothing magic.

  • June30th

    No Comments

    I wonder why it is that changing POV characters has caused changes in the very essence of my prose. Is that a logical thing?

    I distinctly recall after having written a good bit of my draft and reading it back to myself that I felt terribly hemmed in–that my author’s voice, my prose, was chopped off at the feet because I was using a third person  limited  POV. I didn’t think that I could really say things in a way that stepped out side of that character’s inner voice. I decided that it would probably only show itself true in dialog.

    And yet now it just pours out in every sentence with the most expressive words I can find. Why? What has changed in a week? What has accepting the fact that I have to go another direction with this story done to open the floodgates?

    An argument for the power of feedback? The next logical step in drafting–beyond plot now, finally into prose? Understanding that I have no problems telling a story, but that truly I long to show one?

    I’m not sure. Very very not sure. I’ve sent out my new rewrite–very small 800 words out to a few people to demonstrate just how different things have turned from where I thought I was going. But not to my latest critique partner, who explained it the best to me–I hate to bother busy people with my struggles and insecurities. Plus–as freeing as it is to let loose my gifts on this work, I really don’t know if I can write the whole thing to this level. I still have many things to learn about showing, description, active actions….God knows I might be making a whole bigger mess out of it. And by starting the way I have, with this character—-

    I need someone to tell me–is it too much? Did I give something away I shouldn’t have? I can tell you this, by paragraph three, the reader should have a very good idea what the story is about. By paragraph five, you know disaster is sure to strike. In 800 words you know more about the protagonist than you probably knew about him in the whole of the synopsis. Did I grab you with it? Are you so deep into the ficitional dream that you want to come along for the rest of the ride? I can only guess.

  • June29th

    No Comments

    for Irony?

    I’ve been hard-core word editing today, and when I do that, especially for poetry, I carry a small notebook to jot down those turns of phrase before I lose them. I grabbed a notebook for a scene addition–an old one and low and behold, the very last page was about the very scene I wanted to make a note on–dated from last year of course. I think it’s ironic. Maybe someone else would say pathetic–but there is it.

    So then, where am I today….I’ve set aside my fear that I’ve written crap. But I am doing something that I haven’t allowed myself to do from the very start and that is, fuss with the words. It has been all about just getting them down. Well, after yesterday, I thought maybe if I really dug into the guts of the thing I’d feel better–and I think I’m right.

    I am pulling out all the passive verbs and replacing them with action or descriptive verbs. This is just a tiny little piece, mind you just a page and a half or so. The majority of it is actually a several paragraphs long prologue, written in very remote third person, but one in which I’ve tried to take out the passive voice where it makes sense, making sure that the subjects of the sentences are doing the action, not being acted upon.

    Then it transitions into a very up close and personal third person view that is meant to be very intense. That’s where I am trying hard to pull out unneeded modifiers and describe precisely using action without static detail.

    Well, I don’t know of course, but I think it’s starting to take shape. I think if you were to compare this rewrite of the opening scene to the previous–it would be shockingly different–and not simply because I’ve changed the POV character. I’m hitting it on the micro-detail level. Word choices. At last, a dip into language. Editing that feels more about expression and less about plot construction. Oh, that’s in there too, as well as scene construction and all those other things–but just a change of pace.

    Yesterday: The plants were reaching towards him, gorging themselves on his glow, trading their life force with his in kind.

    Today: The broad leafed ferns bejeweled with sparkling droplets trembled as they reached out with their delicate laced tendrils to touch him, gorging themselves on his luminous glow, trading their life force with his in kind.

    Maybe it’s over written or maybe it’s rich with detailall I know is that I finally feel like I’m writing something that sounds like ME.